Susanne Maria Weber
Professorin für gesellschaftliche, politische und
kulturelle Rahmenbedingungen von Bildung und Erziehung unter Berücksichtigung
internationaler Aspekte, Philipps-Universität Marburg
Organising the New - by Design? Dispositives of Creation and institutional
fields of the New
In dynamic, accelerating societies, discourses
on future and innovation, creativity and change more and more are on the agenda
of organized systems. Scientific, political and economical, but as well
methodical programmatics and semantics of organizing shape organizational
discourses as well as the acceptability of change strategies, settings and
processes. Thus, the connection between knowledge, power and practice is a
fruitful analytical approach to organization and the New. On the firmament of
organizational change and innovation strategies, “design” and “design thinking”
comes into being as a “rising star”. As organizational knowledge for
multistakeholder and open innovation processes, it is given a methodical,
organizational and even paradigmatic status.
So what is the relevance of different concepts
of collective creation within the horizon of the “Design-Discourse”? Is
“Design” just a new management fashion, another myth of organizing, or a first
hint on power shifts in the epistemic fields of academic as well as
organizational and institutional discourses of the New? “Organizational
learning”, “deep innovation” and “design-thinking” will be presented and
analyzed as “surfaces” of a discourse and as strategies of epistemic organizing
in institutional fields of the New.
Click here for more Information about Susanne Maria
Weber.
Rudolf Tippelt
Professor für Allgemeine Pädagogik und
Bildungsforschung an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Formen interorganisationaler
Kooperation und ihre organisationspädagogischen Konsequenzen
Vertikale und horizontale Kooperationen von
Organisationen sind heute für die Förderung von life-long und life-wide
learning unabdingbar. Gleichzeitig haben diese Formen der Kooperation implizite
und explizite Konsequenzen für die beteiligten individuellen und
organisationalen Akteure. Auch starke bzw. schwache Beziehungen zwischen
Organisationen bedürfen einer organisationspädagogischen Wirkungsanalyse.
Theoretisch lassen sich entsprechende Wirkungen neo-institutionalistisch
rekonstruieren, sie lassen sich unter dem Aspekt ethikorientierter Führung
reflektieren und stellen neue Anforderungen an die sozialen Beziehungen in den
einzelnen partizipierenden Organisationen.
Für mehr Informationen über Rudolf Tippelt klicken Sie
bitte hier.
Einen Vortrag von Rudolf Tippelt können Sie hier
ansehen.
Michael Peters
Professor of
Policy, Cultural and Social Studies in Education at Waikato University, New
Zealand
Radical Openness: Creative institutions, creative labor and the logic of
public organizations in cognitive capitalism
With the advent of the Internet, web 2.0
technologies and user-generated cultures new principles of radical openness
have become the basis of innovative institutional forms that decentralize and
democratize power relationships, promotes access to knowledge and encourages
symmetrical, horizontal peer learning relationships. In this context radical
openness is a complex code word that represents a change of philosophy and
ethos, a set of interrelated and complex changes that transforms markets, the
mode of production and consumption, and the underlying logic of our
institutions. This paper examines the significance of peer governance, review
and collaboration as a basis for open institutions and open management
philosophies. This form of openness has been theorized in different ways by
Dewey, Pierce and Popper as a “community of inquiry” – a set of values and
philosophy committed to the ethic of criticism that offers means for
transforming our institutions in what Antonio Negri and others call the age of
cognitive capitalism. Expressive and aesthetic labor (“creative labor”) demands
institutional structures for developing “knowledge cultures” as “flat
hierarchies” that permit reciprocal academic exchanges as a new basis for
public institutions.
